Skip to main content

How does Nick begin to put his plan into action in Andrew Clements' Frindle?

In Andrew Clements' Frindle, as soon as Nick decides to take the meanings of words into his own hands by inventing his own word for the word pen, Nick knows his next step is to get other people to use it. Just as Mrs. Granger states, a word doesn't have a meaning unless society agrees about the word's meaning; therefore, Nick knows that he must get other people to agree that a pen is a frindle, not a pen.

The first step to his plan is to go into the Penny Pantry store and ask to purchase a frindle. It takes the woman behind the counter a while to catch on to what he is asking for, but she soon does; he then walks off after having paid 49 cents for a frindle. Next, he recruits his friends to also ask to purchase frindles. On five consecutive days, five of Nick's friends walk into Penny Pantry and ask to purchase frindles: John, Pete, Chris, Dave, and Janet. By the time Janet asks to buy a frindle, the woman behind the counter had become so used to the question that she instantly "reached right for the pens and said, 'Blue or black?'" (p. 35), showing Nick, who was observing from an aisle, that he had already made someone treat the word frindle as a real word. He also asks all five of his friends to take an oath promising to "never use the word PEN again" but to, instead, always "use the word FRINDLE" (p. 35).

The third part of Nick's plan is to use the word in class to get his other classmates to start using it too. He does so by raising his hand and telling Mrs. Granger that he "forgot [his] frindle" (p. 36). Nick's friend John then makes a big show of searching for an extra frindle in his backpack. A fourth part of his plan is to have all of the fifth graders, during their class photo, to say the word frindle, while holding out frindles, instead of the word cheese.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.