Skip to main content

How does Nick begin to put his plan into action in Andrew Clements' Frindle?

In Andrew Clements' Frindle, as soon as Nick decides to take the meanings of words into his own hands by inventing his own word for the word pen, Nick knows his next step is to get other people to use it. Just as Mrs. Granger states, a word doesn't have a meaning unless society agrees about the word's meaning; therefore, Nick knows that he must get other people to agree that a pen is a frindle, not a pen.

The first step to his plan is to go into the Penny Pantry store and ask to purchase a frindle. It takes the woman behind the counter a while to catch on to what he is asking for, but she soon does; he then walks off after having paid 49 cents for a frindle. Next, he recruits his friends to also ask to purchase frindles. On five consecutive days, five of Nick's friends walk into Penny Pantry and ask to purchase frindles: John, Pete, Chris, Dave, and Janet. By the time Janet asks to buy a frindle, the woman behind the counter had become so used to the question that she instantly "reached right for the pens and said, 'Blue or black?'" (p. 35), showing Nick, who was observing from an aisle, that he had already made someone treat the word frindle as a real word. He also asks all five of his friends to take an oath promising to "never use the word PEN again" but to, instead, always "use the word FRINDLE" (p. 35).

The third part of Nick's plan is to use the word in class to get his other classmates to start using it too. He does so by raising his hand and telling Mrs. Granger that he "forgot [his] frindle" (p. 36). Nick's friend John then makes a big show of searching for an extra frindle in his backpack. A fourth part of his plan is to have all of the fifth graders, during their class photo, to say the word frindle, while holding out frindles, instead of the word cheese.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...