Skip to main content

How does Mrs. Linde's character symbolize Nora's potential future in A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen?

The character of Mrs. Linde is that of a woman who, after living her life, is now alone in her middle adulthood. She has had a tough life from the start. She had to give up the man she loved, Krogstad, and ended up marrying a businessman to take care of her mother and brothers. In this case, she sacrificed herself and the love of her life to support her family.


Years later, Mrs. Linde is completely alone. Even though she gave up everything, she did not gain anything from her sacrifice, much like the results of Nora's own sacrifice. Linde's mother and husband are dead, her brothers are all grown up, and she has lost whatever financial stability she once enjoyed. She is now at the mercy of whatever help she can get, and a huge part of this problem is not having the financial stability a man would provide in her society.


Mrs. Linde foreshadows Nora's future because Nora will be what Linde is now: a lonely woman living in a male-dominated society.


Both women tried their best to make something work for themselves by independently using resources to fix their problems. Those efforts led to helping others, but not themselves. Moreover, in the time and place where they live, women are nothing without men. Even Christine admits to as much when she asks Krogstad to take her back, saying,



Nils, how would it be if we two shipwrecked people could join forces? [. . . ] Two on the same piece of wreckage would stand a better chance than each on their own.



Hence, we may expect that Nora will also end up alone in her own middle adulthood. Like Mrs. Linde, she will be without children and leading a life that may depend on the goodwill and charity of others. Hopefully, we won't end up seeing Nora asking her husband to take her back for the sake of company and stability the way Linde does. If this is the case, it would be yet another way to show how Linde definitely represents Nora's future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.