Skip to main content

How does Mrs. Linde's character symbolize Nora's potential future in A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen?

The character of Mrs. Linde is that of a woman who, after living her life, is now alone in her middle adulthood. She has had a tough life from the start. She had to give up the man she loved, Krogstad, and ended up marrying a businessman to take care of her mother and brothers. In this case, she sacrificed herself and the love of her life to support her family.


Years later, Mrs. Linde is completely alone. Even though she gave up everything, she did not gain anything from her sacrifice, much like the results of Nora's own sacrifice. Linde's mother and husband are dead, her brothers are all grown up, and she has lost whatever financial stability she once enjoyed. She is now at the mercy of whatever help she can get, and a huge part of this problem is not having the financial stability a man would provide in her society.


Mrs. Linde foreshadows Nora's future because Nora will be what Linde is now: a lonely woman living in a male-dominated society.


Both women tried their best to make something work for themselves by independently using resources to fix their problems. Those efforts led to helping others, but not themselves. Moreover, in the time and place where they live, women are nothing without men. Even Christine admits to as much when she asks Krogstad to take her back, saying,



Nils, how would it be if we two shipwrecked people could join forces? [. . . ] Two on the same piece of wreckage would stand a better chance than each on their own.



Hence, we may expect that Nora will also end up alone in her own middle adulthood. Like Mrs. Linde, she will be without children and leading a life that may depend on the goodwill and charity of others. Hopefully, we won't end up seeing Nora asking her husband to take her back for the sake of company and stability the way Linde does. If this is the case, it would be yet another way to show how Linde definitely represents Nora's future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...