Skip to main content

What brings on the dramatic conflict of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet?

The dramatic conflict of Romeo and Juliet really has its roots before the play even starts, with the feud of the Montagues and Capulets.  We are told this in the prologue.  The two families are feuding because of some long-forgotten reason and now any time anyone associated with one gets in contact with someone from the other it causes bloodshed.


Things come to a head, however, when Romeo Montague’s friends convince him to sneak into the Capulet’s party.  They should not really be there.  Once there, Romeo falls head-over-heels in love with Juliet Capulet.  That is the real cause of the conflict.  Romeo and Juliet cannot be together.  Their families won’t hear of it.



JULIET


My only love sprung from my only hate!
Too early seen unknown, and known too late!
Prodigious birth of love it is to me,
That I must love a loathed enemy. (Act 1, Scene 5)



Romeo and Juliet do get together, and they decide to try to make a go of it despite the odds.  This includes marriage in secret.  That turns out to be a disaster.  


Romeo gets into a fight with Tybalt, and when his friend Mercutio intervenes, Tybalt kills him.  Then Romeo kills Tybalt.  This is problematic because Tybalt was Juliet's cousin.   Romeo is banished.


Romeo's banishment causes trouble for Juliet.  She is almost forced to marry Paris.  She asks Friar Laurence for help, and he gives her a potion to fake her death, after which he tries to write Romeo a letter warning him. But Romeo doesn't get the letter because of a plague.


When Romeo returns to find Juliet dead, he drinks poison and kills himself.  Juliet wakes up and kills herself with her dagger, and is now really dead.  The good thing is that this ends the conflict between the families.  They bury the feud for good.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more