Skip to main content

Explain these three measures of moles: (mass/Mr), (concentration/vol) and (volume/24).

A mole is defined as the number equal to the quantity of carbon atoms in exactly 12 grams of pure 12^C.  This number of carbon atoms has been empirically determined to be 6.022 x 10^23.  So a mole, or Avogadro's number, can be thought of as a quantity -- very much like 1 dozen eggs is 12 eggs, 1 mole of eggs is 6.022 x 10^23 eggs. 


The mass in grams of one mole of any element (6 x 10^23 atoms) is defined as the molar mass (M) of that element.  An element's molar mass is expressed as the quantity in grams equal to its atomic weight.  So the molar mass (Mr) of sodium (Na) is equal to its atomic weight (amu) in grams which is 22.9 g; 1 mole of Na = 22.9 g = 6 x 10^23 atoms.  For compounds, the masses of the individual atoms are combined to yield the molar mass of the compound.  As an example:


CH4 (methane) has 1 carbon atom (12.1 atomic weight), and 4 hydrogen atoms (1.01 atomic weight).  The molar mass of CH4 (the quantity of 1 mole of methane) is equal to 1 x 12.1 g (carbon component) + 4 x 1.01 g (hydrogen component) = 16.1 g/mole.


If you had 50 g of CH4, then using the equation:


g x 1 mol/Mr = moles


50 g x 1 mole/16.1 g = 3.1 moles


notice grams cancel in this equation


Molarity (M) is a measure of concentration and is defined as the number of moles of solute (dissolved) per liter of solution.  A 1 molar solution of Na (1 M) would have 22.9 g of Na and enough solute to bring the volume to 1 liter.  If 0.435 g KMnO4 (potassium permanganate) is dissolved in enough water to give 250 mL, what is the concentration (M)? 


0.435 g KMnO4 x 1 mol KMnO4/158.0 g KMnO4 [Mr] = 0.00275 mol KMnO4


0.00275 mol KMnO4 /0.250 L = 0.0110 M


The ideal gas law is defined as


pressure(P) x volume (V) = n (moles) x R (gas constant) x temperature (T)


The gas constant, R, is determined based on the units.


Rearranging the equation and solving for volume gives ==


V = nRT/P == for n = 1 mole; T = 298.2 °K (room temperature); R = 0.08206 L•atm/mol•K  → V = (1 mol x 0.08206 L•atm/mol• K x 298.2 K)/1 atm = 24.47 L  = volume 1 mole of gas occupies at room temperature


solving the equation for n (moles) gives ==


n = PV/RT, if pressure and temperature are constant, then the number of moles is dependent on the volume, which at room temperature is a multiple of 24.  As an example, 50 L of a gas at room temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure would have 50L/24 = 2.043 moles of gas.



Hope that helps.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.