Skip to main content

What is Morrie's philosophy about money and power?

Morrie believes that money and power cannot buy true happiness. He tells Mitch that most people have been brainwashed into believing that they can obtain true satisfaction and contentment through material things. In reality, money and power are poor substitutes for love, gentleness, tenderness, or a sense of belonging.


Morrie especially maintains that money and power are of little comfort when one is dying. He says that when he found out he was dying, his desire to acquire material things evaporated. He believes that the only way to obtain true happiness in life is to give of himself to others. As long as he devotes himself to loving others, to serving his community, and to participating in worthwhile projects, his life will always be meaningful.


Morrie also advises Mitch to refrain from proving himself to anyone, whether rich or poor. Rather, he tells Mitch to be open to others and to give of himself from his heart.



“Do the kinds of things that come from the heart. When you do, you won’t be dissatisfied, you won’t be envious, you won’t be longing for somebody else’s things. On the contrary, you’ll be overwhelmed with what comes back.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.