Skip to main content

Can Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet be described as a narrative about the conflict of love and hate?

This play by Shakespeare not only describes the conflicts between love and hate but also shows the grave consequence such hatred can have (to help you see the whole story, you can check out this link, which provides a brief summary).


Love: Romeo and Juliet love each other despite the intense feud between their families. They marry, even though it is forbidden. In the end, they portray that they would rather die than live without each other, even going so far as to kill themselves to avoid the reality of life alone.


Hate: The Montagues and Capulet families hate each other, dueling and killing one another. Neither side will repent or make amends.


Conflict: Romeo and Juliet, each from one of the opposing families, quickly meet, fall in love, and are married. Love springs up in the midst of heavy hatred all around.


Although they love each other, neither gives thought to his/her family. Romeo does not think about how his actions (which cause him to be banished) will affect his relatives, and Juliet does not take her family’s emotions or feelings into consideration when she agrees to take a drought that will make her appear to be dead.  The lovers do not show true love to their families, instead letting passion guide them. In pledging their love for each other, they sacrifice the love of their immediate family, a conflict that will never be resolved.


Consequences: Because of hatred and fighting, Romeo and Juliet must flee. Due to misunderstandings, Romeo believes his new wife to be dead. Rather than live without her, he kills himself. And she, upon waking and seeing him dead, kills herself.


Conclusion: The deaths of Romeo and Juliet ultimately cause the two feuding families to make peace. Love wins, but at the cost of two young lives. 


It took the heavy consequence of hatred—death—to bring this peace about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...