Skip to main content

Can Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet be described as a narrative about the conflict of love and hate?

This play by Shakespeare not only describes the conflicts between love and hate but also shows the grave consequence such hatred can have (to help you see the whole story, you can check out this link, which provides a brief summary).


Love: Romeo and Juliet love each other despite the intense feud between their families. They marry, even though it is forbidden. In the end, they portray that they would rather die than live without each other, even going so far as to kill themselves to avoid the reality of life alone.


Hate: The Montagues and Capulet families hate each other, dueling and killing one another. Neither side will repent or make amends.


Conflict: Romeo and Juliet, each from one of the opposing families, quickly meet, fall in love, and are married. Love springs up in the midst of heavy hatred all around.


Although they love each other, neither gives thought to his/her family. Romeo does not think about how his actions (which cause him to be banished) will affect his relatives, and Juliet does not take her family’s emotions or feelings into consideration when she agrees to take a drought that will make her appear to be dead.  The lovers do not show true love to their families, instead letting passion guide them. In pledging their love for each other, they sacrifice the love of their immediate family, a conflict that will never be resolved.


Consequences: Because of hatred and fighting, Romeo and Juliet must flee. Due to misunderstandings, Romeo believes his new wife to be dead. Rather than live without her, he kills himself. And she, upon waking and seeing him dead, kills herself.


Conclusion: The deaths of Romeo and Juliet ultimately cause the two feuding families to make peace. Love wins, but at the cost of two young lives. 


It took the heavy consequence of hatred—death—to bring this peace about.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more