Skip to main content

Othello acts rashly and hastily—is he as much to blame for the tragedy as Iago is?

Othello's tragic downfall is in his gullibility and lack of good judgement. While he is easily swayed in his opinions about others, his opinions are seemingly fixed unless an outside voice leads him to question his own beliefs. In this, Othello never questions the "goodness" of Iago--nobody calls Iago's character into question until the end of the play. Therefore, Othello never sees "cause" to question Iago's character.


Iago's entire plot hinges on the knowledge that Othello is gullible. We see this in Act 1, scene 3 when, plotting to slander Cassio and Desdemona, Iago says of Othello,



"The Moor is of a free and open nature,
That thinks men honest that but seem to be so,
And will as tenderly be led by the nose
As asses are."



Without this character trait, Iago's plot would never have worked on Othello. And while the relationship between Desdemona and Othello seems solid and loving at the beginning of the play, it is very easy for Iago to convince Othello of her unfaithfulness. In fact, though Othello asks for proof beyond a shadow of a doubt in the matter ("Make me to see't; or, at the least, so prove it, That the probation bear no hinge nor loop To hang a doubt on; or woe upon thy life!" 3.3) he receives what can only be characterized as insubstantial evidence of Desdemona's unfaithfulness. Iago claims to have found the handkerchief in Cassio's chamber, and Othello only sees Cassio engaged in conversation that he believes to be about Desdemona--he doesn't actually hear any of the conversation. Again, he trusts Iago completely.


Furthermore, Othello never directly speaks to Cassio or Desdemona on the matter. He uses the information he receives from Iago to make all of his decisions. And while Iago is masterfully manipulative, it is clear that were Othello not so easily swayed, the tragic outcome of this play might have been avoided.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more