Skip to main content

What are three reasons that the Prince's response to Tybalt's death is fair or unfair?

In Act III, Scene 1, both Mercutio and Tybalt are killed in a street fight. Mercutio is stabbed by Tybalt while Romeo is attempting to break up the fight. Once Mercutio dies, Tybalt, who had run away, inexplicably returns to the scene where he is promptly challenged and killed by the grieving Romeo. When the Prince arrives, he listens to Benvolio, who had been a witness to the violence, give an account of the fight. Benvolio explains truthfully, although Lady Capulet says he is lying. Her version, however, is actually full of lies, claiming that the Montagues had ganged up on Tybalt. She demands the death penalty for Romeo. The Prince listens and his judgement is that Romeo should be banished from Verona. This verdict is unacceptable to Lady Capulet because earlier in the play the Prince had decreed that the penalty for fighting in the streets would be death, with no exceptions.


The Prince's decision is fair for three reasons. First, Tybalt instigated the fight by challenging Romeo and then insulting him by calling him a "villain." Second, even though Mercutio's death was somewhat of an accident, Tybalt was responsible and should have received the Prince's penalty of death. Third, because Tybalt returned to the scene, it is fair to believe that Romeo was simply defending himself against a man who had earlier threatened him.


One might also argue that the Prince's decision was unfair. One argument (Lady Capulet's) might claim that Romeo should suffer the death penalty because that was the law and Romeo should have understood that fighting in the street would bring the harshest judgement. Another argument that Romeo should face the death penalty is that Romeo was actually at fault for Mercutio's death as well as Tybalt's. Romeo should have initially fought his own battle and not allowed his friend to take his place. Romeo even admits this just before Tybalt returns:





This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally,
My very friend, hath got this mortal hurt
In my behalf. My reputation stained
With Tybalt’s slander—Tybalt, that an hour
Hath been my cousin! O sweet Juliet,
Thy beauty hath made me effeminate
And in my temper softened valor’s steel.





Another way to look at the decision would be to argue that even banishment was totally unfair to Romeo. After all, he did all he could to attempt to stop the fighting between Tybalt and Mercutio. He backed down to Tybalt and even told Tybalt that he loved him. When Mercutio was stabbed, Romeo was only trying to break things up. Tybalt was at fault for virtually everything that happened, and Romeo was only reacting to the shock of seeing his best friend dead.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more