Skip to main content

In Romeo and Juliet, when Mercutio makes the remark, "a plague o' both your houses" as he is dying in Act III, how does it relate to the prologue?

Mercutio was never supposed to become involved in the altercation that ended his life.  Tybalt came for Romeo, and Romeo alone.  However, when Romeo refused to fight Tybalt, Mercutio felt that his behavior brought him dishonor.  Rather than permit this, Mercutio fought Tybalt himself, and Tybalt slays him when Romeo comes between them.  When Mercutio curses the houses of Capulet and Montague with plague, it recalls the line from the Prologue where the Chorus calls the love between Romeo and Juliet's love "death-marked."  Further, the "fearful passage" that their love takes spells destruction for so many more than just the two of them.  Their love is, to be sure, death-marked; consider everyone that dies during the "fearful passage" of their relationship: Mercutio, Tybalt, County Paris, their two selves.  When Mercutio sends "a plague" on the lovers' families, he helps to fulfill the Prologue's promises.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.