Skip to main content

When Peter tells Wendy his name in Peter Pan by J. M. Barrie, why does she say, "Is that all?"

When Peter describes himself as just "Peter Pan," Wendy is surprised at his lack of names outside of a given name and surname. It is possible she also thinks that "Pan" is quite short in syllables as compared to her own surname-- "Darling." Wendy, herself, has four names in all--a given (or first) name, two middle names, and one surname. For the time period and assumed social status of the Darling family, it would not have been uncommon for Wendy to know people with very long names. The book Peter Pan was first published in 1904, so we can assume the setting to be around around this time, possibly earlier. Based on the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Darling are dressing nicely for an evening social event and can afford to employ household staff, they are likely of the upper or upper-middle class. 


During both the Victorian and Edwardian periods, people of the upper classes of society often had very long names as a means of carrying on their heritage. There could be multiple given or middle names, one or both of which was commonly a family name. For example, Wendy's brother George is named after his father, but would likely have a different middle name. In the uppermost part of society, people also had titles such as Lady or Baron or Duke. Wendy has most likely become accustomed to people having rather long names, possibly including multiple middle names and titles. No wonder "Peter Pan" sounds short to her!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more