Skip to main content

Why do characters in The Crucible lie and what are the objectives of the ones who tell the truth?

There are a number of reasons for why characters lie in this play, but the simplest way to answer the question is to say that the lies serve their desires and protect their interests. Every character has a different set of desires and interests. One very prominent liar is Abigail Williams. Abigail lies about her activities in the woods because she doesn't want her uncle to think she is disobedient, particularly because she was recently fired from her job as a servant for the Proctors. Abigail lies about seeing various townswomen "with the devil" because she knows that showing she is caught up in the hysteria will help destabilize the town. Abigail believes she will get her way if the status quo is breached. Abigail wants John Proctor to leave his wife for her, and thinks this can happen if she lies about Elizabeth Proctor and impugns her good name. Abigail also lies in the courtroom, pretending to see things that support her narrative of bewitchment. All the lies Abigail tells are self-serving and aimed at getting what she wants.


As for characters who tell the truth, the main reason they do so is because they are honest by nature. The characters who make a point of telling the truth do so to counter the accusations against them, and to express their integrity and piety. Characters such as Rebecca Nurse and John Proctor are known to be honest, and they believe their good reputations are sufficient for people to believe they are telling the truth. They soon learn, however, that their words can be twisted in this atmosphere of hysteria. As they attempt to unravel the mystery of the witchcraft accusations, the judges are just as likely to believe lies as truth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more