Skip to main content

What is survival of the fittest?

Survival of the fittest is part of Charles Darwin's mechanism for evolutionary changes.  It's part of a larger concept called "natural selection."  It works like this.  Random changes in the genetic code lead to individuals in a species having various adaptations.  A particular adaptation might be good for a particular time and environment, or it might be bad.  Individuals with an adaptation that is not beneficial are more likely to die or be killed.  Individuals with a beneficial adaptation are more likely to survive.  The ability of an organism to survive and pass on their genes is called "fitness."  In other words, organisms with beneficial adaptations are the fittest organisms within a given population; therefore, the fittest tend to survive.  Survival of the fittest.  


Because the fittest are surviving, they are passing on their genetic traits.  Nature is essentially selecting which traits are getting passed down from generation to generation and which traits disappear from the gene pool.  Hence, natural selection.  I summarize it all for my students with a flow chart that resembles the following:


Adaptation --> increased fitness --> survival via natural selection --> evolutionary changes

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more