Skip to main content

How could I conduct a search on measures to protect the public in the case of a terrorist attack using biological weapons?

When preparing a report or project on the threat of a terrorist attack utilizing biological weapons, there is a wealth of material in the public domain that any student can access. 


Because the use of germs to destroy or demoralize an enemy has been around since at least the 14th century, there is a long history of efforts by myriad governments and nongovernmental organizations to develop biological weaponry and, conversely, to protect against the use by adversaries of such weapons. From the moment a dead animal or human corpse was deliberately dropped into the water supply of an enemy village or town during medieval times for the purpose of contaminating those water supplies, biological weapons and the threat of their use has been a part of civil defense planning. In the United States, concerns about the use of biological and chemical weapons by the Soviet Union during the Cold War -- and the Soviet Union was known to maintain a massive program designed to develop biological weapons and prepare for their use -- gave way following the fall of the Berlin Wall to increased worries about the potential use of such weapons by terrorist organizations like al Qaeda and, now, the Islamic State. American worries about the use of biological and/or chemical weapons by terrorists, in fact, spurred the growth of an entirely new industry to develop and market the means of protecting populations against an attack.


The post-Cold War emphasis on preparing for what used to be called "asymmetric warfare" by hostile regimes and non-state actors like al Qaeda has provided considerable research material on efforts at protecting against biological weapons. Linked below are useful resources any student can utilize in preparing a report on measures taken or considered to prepare for such an attack. Another useful source, and one that should definitely be consulted by anybody performing research on this topic, is the homepage of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, a very large federal agency established following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, was given as one of its mandates the protection of the United States against biological and chemical weapons attacks by terrorists, as well as by rogue regimes such as Iran and North Korea. [See on this point: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/prep_biological_fact_sheet.pdf]


The United States, following the end of the Cold War and the onset of the focus on countering terrorist organizations, was, and largely remains, woefully unprepared for attacks utilizing germs. During the Cold War, in marked contrast to the Soviet Union, the United States deliberately minimized what is known as "civil defense," efforts intended to protection populations and key government officials from nuclear, chemical or biological attack. Many in the U.S., primarily on the left side of the political spectrum, eschewed civil defense measures as a waste of money and, more importantly, as potentially provocative. The belief among such individuals and groups was that, by preparing to survive a war against an enemy who would use "weapons of mass destruction," the American Government would make such a war more likely. As a consequence, civil defense was relegated to a very minor place in U.S. national security planning. That failure to plan for the possibility of an attack utilizing weapons of mass destruction resulted in the U.S. being seriously vulnerable to types of weapons we know with absolute certainty are developed and possessed by potential adversaries


Any research project dedicated to the issue of protecting against biological weapons should emphasize the history of the development and use of such weapons, and the measures taken since the attacks of 9/11 to detect the presence of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and to respond to their use by terrorists. Again, following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. Government became extremely concerned about the potential for the use by terrorists of biological weapons. Efforts to train and equip "first responders," such as police and fire departments, emergency medical technician teams, and hospital workers were among the first steps taken, but the U.S. remains very ill-prepared for such an attack. 


The first of the following links is to the transcripts of a public hearing on the threat of a biological weapons attack on the United States by a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives. Students should review this transcript as a logical introduction to the topic and the continuing concern about the lack of adequate preparedness on the part of the United States.


http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA14/20140507/102195/HHRG-113-FA14-Transcript-20140507.pdf


http://www3.nd.edu/~techrev/Archive/Spring2002/a10.html


http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/6/465.full


http://www.emedicinehealth.com/biological_warfare/page3_em.htm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more