Skip to main content

How would you contrast Portia in The Merchant of Venice with Portia in Julius Caesar?

Portia in The Merchant of Venice and Portia in Julius Caesar are both admirable female characters who display many of the same traits of courage, intelligence, loyalty, and ingenuity. They are some of the more attractive female characters in Shakespeare and seem intended as positive role models for women. Both are members of the upper classes. There are, however, several differences between them:


  • The women lived in different eras. The Merchant of Venice is set in Renaissance Venice; Julius Caesar, in ancient Rome. Thus, although both plays were set in what would eventually become Italy, a region Shakespeare never visited, The Merchant of Venice is set in Shakespeare's own period (around 1600 CE) and Julius Caesar over 1,500 years before he was born.


  • Julius Caesar's Portia is the wife of Brutus and mother of his children, while The Merchant of Venice's Portia is initially an unmarried young woman being courted by various suitors. Thus, The Merchant of Venice's Portia is likely much younger than the already married Portia.

  • Although both show a strength of character thought to be unusual for women in their time periods, in The Merchant of Venice Portia acts in a far more unconventional fashion by dressing up as a man and arguing a case at court.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more