Skip to main content

idioms - "Gun an engine" vs. "Rev an engine"



The driver of the van brakes sharply at every red light or junction and guns the engine when we move off. I begin to sweat—travelling sideways isn't helping.
Apple Tree Yard



"To gun the engine" is a new expression for me. I would have said the driver "revs the engine" but because the author, Louise Doughty is British, it must be well known in the UK. However, I have a feeling it's a recent coinage.


Is there a difference between rev and gun an engine? Can I say: "I gunned my car"?
OR "He gunned the vehicle as if his life depended on it"? Do you only gun an engine?



Answer



In the US we usually "rev" a motor that's idling or in neutral, while reserving the term "gun" for rapidly accelerating the engine of a vehicle in gear to significantly increase speed, as you describe in your example. Ps: your driver reminds me of my dad!


Edit: I looked for supporting references but couldn't find any that recognize the distinctions I indicated. These different usages are actual in vernacular AmE though probably not recognized by some, and certainly not absolute. One could use these terms interchangeably and be clearly understood. I wouldn't personally, but hey, I hang out here, with a more discriminating crowd!


Ps: oh yeah, in America we not only love to hold a gun, and to fire guns, we also like to use the word gun, as often as possible, hence, we gun our engines.


Here is a reference from a car fanatics forum illustrating my contention that a subtle distinction does exist between revving an engine and gunning a motor vehicle:



TOMCAT104


Whereas turbo's engine low-end torque might be more useful in daily driving situations (and since BMW seems to have reduce the turbo's lag to insignificance), it might have an advantage over the n.a in that respect. True, turbos cannot replace the joy of reving your engine high and gunning it, but in practice for most daily driving situations, would a turbo be actually a more suitable engine?


from BIMMERFORUMS


GUN verb (used with object), gunned, gunning.


10. to cause (an engine, vehicle, aircraft, etc.) to increase in speed very quickly by increasing the supply of fuel.


Dictionary.com


rev (v.) 1916, from earlier noun (1901), shortening of revolution, in reference to the internal combustion engine. Related: Revved; revving.


gun (v.) " to shoot with a gun," 1620s, from gun (n.); the sense of "to accelerate an engine" is from 1930, from earlier phrase to give (something) the gun. Related: Gunned; gunning.


The Online Etymology Dictionary



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.