Skip to main content

A 200-gallon tank is full of a solution containing 25 pounds of concentrate. Starting at time t = 0 distilled water is admitted to the tank at a...

Q:


A 200-gallon tank is full of a solution containing 25 pounds of concentrate. Starting at time t = 0, distilled water is admitted to the tank at a rate of 10 gallons per minute, and the well-stirred solution is withdrawn at the same rate. Find the amount of concentrate Q in the solution as a function of t.


A:


At time zero, we start with a concentration of `(25 lb)/(200 gal)` , which we can reduce to `(0.125 lb)/(gal)` . This is the first expression in the formula because it is the starting concentration. 


Replacing 10 gallons of the solution with 10 gallons of pure (distilled) water is equivalent to reducing the total concentration by 5% (.05) every minute after time 0. That is, at the end of each minute, the solution will be 95% (0.95) as concentrated as the previous one.


This is an example of continuous exponential decay. In other words, the concentration will decrease exponentially as a function of time. Thus, we will use the general formula


`Q(t) = Q_0*e^(k*t)`


In the above formula, Q(t) is the concentration at t minutes, `Q_0` is our initial concentration, k is the rate of growth/decay in Q (0.95), and t is the time in minutes.


Therefore the final formula will look like this:


`Q(t) = 0.125 (lb)/(gal)*e^(0.95*t)`


where t is the time in minutes. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more