Skip to main content

How does poverty affect a country's economy?

There are two main ways in which poverty affects a typical economy. First, it reduces the level of aggregate demand in the economy, making the economy poorer than it could be. Second, it typically requires the government to institute some sort of welfare programs, leading to increased government spending.


When there is poverty in an economy, governments typically feel compelled to act. They feel they have to do something to help protect the poor from the effects of poverty. In the US, for example, the government provides poorer people with things like health care and help with buying food. When the government does these things, government spending has to increase. This means the government either needs to increase taxes or run higher deficits. Either way, the economy can be affected to some degree.


Perhaps more importantly, poverty can reduce aggregate demand in an economy. Poor people cannot afford to buy as many goods and services as people with more income can. When a country has a high number of poor people, its population as a whole cannot buy as much as it would be able to if there were less poverty. This means there is less demand for goods or services produced in that country.  Because of this reduced aggregate demand, the country’s GDP will be lower than it would be if there were less poverty. This can severely restrict the country’s economic potential.


These are the two most important ways in which poverty can affect a country’s economy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more