Skip to main content

How does Scout and Aunt Alexandra's relationship develop in To Kill A Mockingbird?

Scout and Aunt Alexandra continually disagree throughout the novel and initially view each other with contempt. Aunt Alexandra disapproves of Scout's "tomboy" persona, and Scout mentions that Alexandra views her as being dull and boring. Scout opposes Alexandra's beliefs on how females should act, and refuses to wear a dress and stay indoors. After Alexandra moves into the Finch household, she has several disagreements with Atticus regarding Cal's job and Atticus' parenting style. However, Scout begins to perceive Alexandra's softer side following the disappointing trial of Tom Robinson.


Alexandra expresses her concern and support for Atticus, which Scout finds surprising and pleasant. Although Scout still disagrees with Alexandra on topics such as heredity and social class, Alexandra no longer criticizes Scout for her lifestyle. Scout agrees to participate in the missionary circle and witnesses Alexandra's empathy for her brother after Atticus tells her that Tom Robinson was shot dead trying to escape from the prison yard.


In Chapter 28, following Bob Ewell's attack, Alexandra is quick to care for Scout and helps Scout get out of her crushed costume. Alexandra continually asks Scout if she is alright, and refers to Scout as "darling." In the midst of the helping Scout, Alexandra brings over Scout's overalls, which are "the garments she most despised" (Lee 354).


As Scout grows older, she notices that Alexandra is not her enemy and that her aunt simply wants what it is best for her. Alexandra becomes less controlling because she realizes Atticus is under a lot of stress, and her concerns are not as important as the difficult situation at hand. Scout begins to have an open mind about becoming a "lady," and Alexandra displays her love for her niece after the tragic event at the end of the novel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...