Skip to main content

According to the text from DuFour, R.(2010), Raising the Bar and Closing the Gap: Whatever it Takes, what evidence of the three big Professional...

The three big ideas behind the concept of the Professional Learning Community is that they help students learn (not simply be taught); that they involve teachers in a collaborative process; and that schools monitor their effectiveness at helping students learn. Public schools nationwide offer scant evidence that they are helping students learn rather than be taught. High-stakes testing based on Common Core Standards measure students' responses in narrow ways that pay little attention to how much students are actually learning (rather than simply regurgitating). These tests also pay little attention to the process of learning, which is as important as the outcome. In addition, teachers, strapped for time to teach to the tests, do not have time to work collaboratively, and their assessment of their results is based on state tests rather than how effectively they have created a Professional Learning Community. 


To establish a Professional Learning Community, schools must measure the process of learning, rather than just the outcome. In other words, how are students asking questions and finding answers? These are the essential skills that schools should be measuring, not just responses to Common Core Standards-based tests. In addition, teachers need more professional development time to work collaboratively and hone their practice, and schools should measure how effectively they are modeling and teaching the process of learning, not just students' mastery of the Common Core. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.