Skip to main content

In Reason, Faith, and Tradition, why does Martin Albl say that the Christian understanding of Jesus is shocking and offensive?

In Reason, Faith, and Tradition: Explorations in Catholic Theology, Martin Albl focuses on the relationship between faith and reason, challenging the notion that they are incompatible with one another. He argues that through studying this relationship within the framework of Catholic tradition, one can obtain a truer and more satisfying understanding of the world and human nature. In essence, Albl believes that this realization cannot be obtained through reason alone, and faith requires reason to cultivate and maintain a balanced worldview.


In his efforts to connect reason and faith, Albl spends time addressing the questions surrounding the historical Jesus in chapter 11. He discusses the various misinterpretations of Jesus’s life, personality, and actions:



“Contrary to the claims of some Christians, it is historically highly unlikely that Jesus went about ‘talking as if He was God,’ claiming that ‘He has always existed.’ Passages such as ‘Before Abraham was, I AM’ (John 8:58) are found only in the Gospel of John, which tends to develop the claims of the historical Jesus in the light of later theological reflections” (Albl, 302).



Because of these contradictory elements in the Gospels, Albl argues that we must critically analyze these scriptures to obtain “a more historically accurate portrait of the words and actions of the first-century Jew named Jesus of Nazareth” (Albl, 302-303). Albl proceeds to offer a pithy version of this form of analysis throughout Chapter 11, calling out several other mainstream Christian misconceptions of the historical Jesus. In addition, he argues that the actual moment of Jesus’s resurrection cannot be studied as an historical event.


Although Albl may not have used the words “shocking” or “offensive” in this book to describe the Christian understanding of Jesus, his work in chapter 11 implies that he has problems with the mainstream faith-based view of Jesus. Albl’s analysis reveals how the common Christian interpretation has blurred the lines of faith, reason, metaphor, and history—ultimately leading to a misinterpretation that undermines (or offends) the spiritual value of the religious tradition itself.


Works cited:


Albl, Martin C. Reason, Faith, and Tradition: Explorations in Catholic Theology. Winona, MN: St. Mary’s Press, 2009.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more