Skip to main content

In Chapter 5 of Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, what news does Nick have for Gatsby when he crosses over to his house that night?

In The Great Gatsby, it becomes increasingly clear that everything Gatsby does, the money he has made, the purchase of his mansion, and the parties that he throws, is with the aim of getting Daisy back in his life.  She has yet to appear at a party, and through Jordan Baker, Gatsby asks Nick if he will invite Daisy to tea at Nick's house, so he can meet her there.  Nick lets Gatsby know he has spoken with Jordan and that he is willing to invite Daisy to tea. They agree on two days hence. The plan was that Daisy was not to know that the purpose was a rendezvous with Gatsby, but Nick does tell Daisy to not bring Tom with her, and she agrees. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.