Skip to main content

How did the second Industrial Revolution affect American society?

The Second Industrial Revolution began in the early 1870s and lasted up until World War I.  The First Industrial Revolution had produced mass manufacturing in factories.  Before the rise of factories, most goods had been made by hand.  Many were made by skilled artisans.  Greater technological advancements during the Second Industrial Revolution brought about rapid change.


New technologies allowed for efficient heating of steel.  Steel become an important building commodity.  Steel was used for the railroads that crisscrossed across the country, as well as new buildings like skyscrapers.  


Electricity was harnessed and the lightbulb was invented.  Oil was used as fuel before electricity became common.  Gasoline became fuel for automobiles, which were produced on modern assembly lines.  The rubber industry flourished as tires were needed for automobiles.


The telephone connected people who otherwise would have had to wait for letter delivery to communicate.  This new form of communication transformed the way information was spread.


American society was greatly impacted by the Second Industrial Revolution.  People could travel great distances in shorter spans of time due to railroad networks.  Electricity powered lights and eventually small appliances in homes.  Personal automobiles allowed people the freedom to travel whenever they wished.  Information was able to travel quickly through the telephone.  The world was transformed, and it started to resemble the society we live in today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.