Skip to main content

Describe the rationalization process of the Erinyes in "The Eumenides" by Aeschylus.

The Erinyes are the Furies and usually consist of three deities of destruction and vengeance. They are understood to be advocates for the dead.


In the play, the Erinyes want Orestes to pay in blood and suffering for his mother Clytemnestra's murder. The Erinyes/Furies rationalize their thirst for blood vengeance by referencing the ancient Greek codes of blood-pollution. Because Orestes killed his mother, they claim that he has polluted his legacy; the Erinyes emphatically argue that this kind of familial pollution can never be erased. On the other hand, the Erinyes do not interest themselves in pursuing Clytemnestra for killing Agamemnon (her husband) because the two are not blood kin.


According to the Erinyes, guilt can only be effaced through the execution of equivalent violence on behalf of the victim. Furthermore, the Erinyes maintain that Orestes deserves to be driven mad for his matricide; they hound him mercilessly with the miasma of Clytemnestra's dead spirit. The dead spirit is believed to be a polluted presence, and therefore poses a danger to the larger community. Here, the Erinyes reference the ancient Greek belief that murder can render a perpetrator insane. During the trial, the Erinyes stress that Orestes can never remove the blood-taint of his matricide, and they pronounce him unclean and unworthy to perform any religious rituals in his city. Essentially, the Erinyes reject the claim that anything other than blood atonement can purify Orestes.


Sources:


Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion: Early Greek Religion, Volume 1 by Andrej Petrovic, Ivana Petrovic.


Restless Dead: Encounters Between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece by Sarah Iles Johnston

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more