Skip to main content

"Violence of temper approaching to mania has been hereditary in the men of the family," Miss Stoner says of her stepfather's family. Do you think...

Dr. Roylott certainly gives plenty of evidence of possessing violence of temper approaching to mania, but the only evidence that it might be inherited is Helen Stoner's assertion. She must know a lot more about Roylott and his ancestors than she tells Holmes and Watson in her back story. A modern reader might feel skeptical about her belief that her stepfather could have inherited his violence of temper from the men of his family. But we must remember that people in the Victorian era knew less about such matters than is known today. There were undoubtedly a lot of false theories about human psychology and genetics in vogue at the time which have since been discredited. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's purpose in having Helen offer this diagnosis of her stepfather's violent temper is most likely to offer some explanation for it, however speculative. It tends to make his character more credible. Helen's explanation of Roylott's near-mania sounds somewhat "Victorian"--but this is a Victorian tale written in 1892 and set in Victorian England.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.