Skip to main content

How do you respond to the conception of race with which Hurston ends her essay "How It Feels to Be Colored Me"?

How you respond to Hurston's conception of race will depend on your own personal interpretation of what she's saying; I'll offer below a few ways you might react.


Let's start by reviewing what she's saying about race at the close of the essay. By comparing herself to "a brown bag" filled with all kinds of random things, and by comparing other people of various races to other bags similarly filled with various contents, Hurston is saying that it really doesn't matter what color we are on the outside--we're all filled with basically the same things (the same thoughts, feelings, experiences, etc.) and that this essential similarity that transcends race is probably how we were created to be by God ("the Great Stuffer of Bags"). Basically, then, Hurston is saying that even though her own experiences have taught her that she's treated differently because she's "colored," she believes that race just shouldn't matter that much, and that furthermore, we're all fairly alike on the inside. She sees herself as "merely a fragment of the Great Soul" and asserts that her race is a much less important aspect of herself.


So, reading this very influential essay now, and focusing on this conception of race as it's presented in the last few paragraphs of the essay, you might find that you completely agree with what Hurston is saying about race. You might say that you're a human being first, perhaps a gender second, and maybe a nationality third, and then a member of the marching band fourth, and a Girl Scout fifth, and so on, until at some point you get around to classifying yourself by your race, but then you just barely ascribe any importance at all to your race as you're defining yourself.


Or, you might disagree with Hurston completely. Perhaps your race is important to your sense of self; maybe it's even the central idea around which you organize all your other labels and character traits. "I'm Asian, and it matters. I'm trying my best to succeed in my chosen sport because I'm Asian." "I'm black, and I'm proud of it. I'm choosing to wear my hair in a natural style because it's beautiful, and it shows the world I've embraced my God-given body."


Your reaction can also fall somewhere in between agreement and disagreement. You might feel a sense of detachment from the whole concept, for example, if you live in a country where you're seen as the "default" race and you've never thought too much one way or the other about whether it matters. You might feel a lot of admiration for Hurston's ideas, written as they were in 1928, when discrimination against black people ran rampant in society.


As long as your written reaction is detailed and clear, showing an understanding of both what Hurston was saying and the historical context in which she was saying it, your reaction will be valid.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more