Skip to main content

Based on David Laskin’s book The Long Way Home, answer the following questions. Discuss how World War I started in 1914 and then how the United...

World War I started in 1914, when a nineteen-year-old Serbian nationalist killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Hapsburg empire. The eventual result was that the Austro-Hungarian empire declared war on Serbia, Serbia sought and achieved an alliance with Russia, and Germany joined with Austria-Hungary. Most of the major countries of Europe were drawn into the war.


Woodrow Wilson, the American President, had tried to keep the U.S. out of World War I, and he had campaigned on that promise during his re-election bid in 1916. However, events in 1917 made it hard for him to keep his promise, including unrestricted submarine warfare conducted by the Germans (Laskin, 118) and the Zimmermann telegram, sent by Germay's foreign secretary to the German ambassador stationed in Mexico with the proposal to start an alliance with Mexico against the U.S.


One soldier who Laskin portrays in Max Cieminski, who was born in Wisconsin and grew up speaking Kaszubian and German. His family was from an ethnic group in Poland, and he barely spoke English when he was abducted into the army in 1917. He was sent to different training camps, along them a camp in Mississippi. Max was processed into the army even though he was missing his trigger finger, the result of a childhood injury. He felt mistreated by his German American drill sergeant in training camp, and was seen as different because he did not speak English as his first language.


Fighting in France as part of the French-American attack on the Marne salient, Max's platoon came under German fire during an advance on Trugny. German shells likely caused his death, though the exact cause of his death is unknown. While Max fought alongside other Americans, he was still treated as an outsider to some degree. His captain, Haggerty, considered Max "criminally unprepared" (Laskin, 207) for the army. Though it was not his fault that he was accepted by mistake into the army without a trigger finger, his captain made Max suffer for it before Max died in battle. Therefore, Max was in many ways not accepted as an equal to the other soldiers and likely still felt more like someone whose family was from Kaszub than someone who was fully American. If I could meet Max, I would ask him how it felt to be somewhat ostracized in the army, even though he was born in the U.S. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.