Skip to main content

Critically examine the main features of the picaresque novel in the 18th century

The picaresque novel is a first-hand account of an adventurer, generally of the lower class, as he travels about. It is composed of a series of adventures and subplots in which the hero interacts with people from different social classes and tries to outwit them through lying, cheating, and stealing. The novel satirizes the values of upper-crust society as the hero constantly tries to subvert these values and lives by the codes of the lower class. This type of literature came from Spain in the 1500s, and the most famous example is Don Quixote in the 1600s.


By the 18th century, the picaresque novel was on the decline, to be replaced by novels with a deeper sense of character. However, the picaresque lived on in the 18th century in novels such as Tom Jones by Henry Fielding (1749), in which Tom, an orphan, grows to adulthood and witnesses the debauched nature of London at the time. The 18th century picaresque novel, like Tom Jones, combined elements of the picaresque novel with elements of the bildungsroman, of the novel of development that showed the growth of the protagonist from childhood to adulthood. Like the picaresque novel, it featured subplots of adventure but had a tighter structure than earlier novels.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.