Skip to main content

Who understood Gatsby the most?

By the end of the novel, the one who best understands Gatsby is Nick.


Daisy loves Gatsby, but she does not know much about who he is or where he comes from. Nor does she realize, when they are reunited, that he thinks she will now divorce Tom and pick up her romance with Gatsby where it left off. When Tom brutally reveals to her that Gatsby is not who he claims to be, she is shaken and confused.


Tom "understands" Gatsby in the sense that he realizes Gatsby is not what he seems. He doesn't trust Gatsby's word, and does some research on where his money is coming from. Tom understands Gatsby's economic and social status better than anybody, but he does not understand Gatsby's thinking or motivations.  


Nick does not start out understanding Gatsby well. At the beginning of the novel, he has never met him. Then, attending a party of Gatsby's, he hears rumors about him, but still doesn't know what he looks like or how old he is. He talks with Gatsby for several minutes before he realizes that the young man he is speaking with is Gatsby.


As the friendship develops between the two men, Nick often gets the feeling that Gatsby is not telling the whole truth about himself and his past, but then Gatsby will offer some kind of proof, and Nick will immediately trust him again. But he still knows very little of Gatsby or his motivations.


It is not until Gatsby asks Nick, through Jordan, to arrange a meeting with Daisy, that Nick finds out Gatsby's reason for the huge house, the location of the house, and the wild parties. Jordan tells Nick a story from five years ago that reveals that Gatsby and Daisy were once in love. At this point, Nick feels that now Gatsby makes sense to him. He still does not know how much of what Gatsby has told him is true, but he understands Gatsby's feelings well enough to help him get over his nerves and embarrassment when he first meets Daisy. Nick (and, it seems, Nick alone) realizes how much of an emotional investment Gatsby has made in the idea of Daisy, and the idea of himself living in Daisy's world as Daisy's lover. 


During the awful argument between Tom, Daisy, and Gatsby, Nick and Daisy realize for the first time that Gatsby really is mixed up in illegal business. It's after this that Daisy and Gatsby, racing home from that awful scene, hit Myrtle Wilson with their car. Nick comes in the other car with Tom and witnesses the havoc of Myrtle's death. When he next sees Gatsby, he is disgusted with him, in part because he thinks it was Gatsby driving. Then he finds out that it was Daisy driving—and it's on that same evening that Gatsby finally tells Nick his personal history: how he was born James Gatz of North Dakota, how he seduced Daisy without ever intending to fall in love with her, and so on. At the end of this conversation, the exhausted Nick still does not like Gatsby very much, but he understands him very, very well.


After Gatsby is shot, Nick's sympathies shift. He feels he is the only friend left to the dead Gatsby. He becomes even more loyal to Gatsby when he sees that none of Gatsby's former "friends," including Tom, Daisy, and all the people who attended Gatsby's parties, will so much as come to his funeral.


The only exception is one man whom Nick once met at a party of Gatsby's. This man, at the time, was in Gatsby's library, drunk and marveling that all the books were real. Though not as good a friend as Nick, this man arguably understood Gatsby a bit. He sensed Gatsby was a fake, hence he expected to find the books were fake. When he found they were real, he was impressed, perhaps sensing that Gatsby was trying not just to fake at being an upper-class person, but to actually turn himself into a different person.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more