Skip to main content

According to Daniel Goffman in The Ottoman Empire and the Early Modern Europe, how did the Ottomans administer their vast realm, and what did...

In the late 14th century, the Ottoman Empire began to use slaves as part of the janissary corps, or infantry units that made up the sultan's bodyguards and the troops that served in his house. These soldiers served the sultan directly under leaders such as Bayezid I, Mehmed I, Murad II, and Mehmed II. Janissaries were taken away from their cultures and became loyal to the sultans. They helped, as Goffman writes, "domestically to neutralize the Turkoman cavalry and internationally to neutralize European innovations in military technology" (page 65). Therefore, the janissaries were important in helping the sultan consolidate power at home and abroad.


The janissaries formed one part of the kapikulu, or slave military corps that composed a great deal of the Ottoman bureaucracy. Following Mehmed II, nearly every grand vizier was from this class. By the time Suleyman was in power, one had to be part of this class to even be considered for advancement. Membership in what Goffman calls this "pseudo-aristocracy" was determined more by being a slave than by ethnicity, language, or any other quality. Not only did the aristocracy own slaves, but many of the aristocracy also were in fact slaves. 


While there were different classes of people in the Ottoman empire, Goffman writes that "there was considerable variation in the memberships and meanings of these groupings" (page 91). He writes that this adaptability was essential to the Ottomans' ability to rule over such as vast area:



"The secret to Ottoman longevity and the empire's ability to rule over a vast and mixed collection of territories was not its legendary military, its loyal bureaucracy, its series of competent rulers, or a particular system of land tenure. Rather, it was simply its flexibility in dealing with this diverse society" (page 92).



The Ottomans dealt with different classes of people differently in different areas of its empire, and exercised what Goffman calls "flexibility in governance" (page 92). These were the keys to its ability to rule over a vast area. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...