Skip to main content

What is Charles's strongest character trait and why?

In Shirley Jackson's short story "Charles," the title character's strongest trait is his audacity. From the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, audacity is defined as: "A confident and daring quality often seen as shocking or rude." 


In this story, a boy named Laurie invents a boy named Charles to explain his behavior at school. His parents are baffled by the stories of Charles, and concerned. They often overlook the behavior that Laurie displays at home that is mirroring that of his alter ego.


While telling his parents that Charles is responsible, Laurie commits many heinous acts at school. Some of his most audacious acts are: hitting the teacher, yelling so loudly he disturbs other classes, bouncing a see-saw off the head of a classmate, causing her to bleed, punching a boy in the stomach, and convincing a classmate to speak an obscene word, then saying it himself.  


While all these acts are being committed, Laurie's mother and father seem oblivious to Laurie's actions. Even when Laurie's father tries to correct his disrespectful behavior, with a stern "See here, young man," the parents think that it is Charles's influence that has made him act this way. 


At home, Laurie has the audacity to insult his father twice, saying "Hi Pop, y'old dust mop," and the joke: "Look up, look down, look at my thumb, gee you're dumb!" He laughs "insanely" after saying this to his father. He also shouts raucously in the house and down the street on his way home. He spilled his sister's milk and walks away while his father is still talking to him. 


All of these behaviors would be considered audacious today for a kindergartener, but in 1948 when it was first published, it would have seemed incredibly audacious. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more