Skip to main content

What is Charles's strongest character trait and why?

In Shirley Jackson's short story "Charles," the title character's strongest trait is his audacity. From the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, audacity is defined as: "A confident and daring quality often seen as shocking or rude." 


In this story, a boy named Laurie invents a boy named Charles to explain his behavior at school. His parents are baffled by the stories of Charles, and concerned. They often overlook the behavior that Laurie displays at home that is mirroring that of his alter ego.


While telling his parents that Charles is responsible, Laurie commits many heinous acts at school. Some of his most audacious acts are: hitting the teacher, yelling so loudly he disturbs other classes, bouncing a see-saw off the head of a classmate, causing her to bleed, punching a boy in the stomach, and convincing a classmate to speak an obscene word, then saying it himself.  


While all these acts are being committed, Laurie's mother and father seem oblivious to Laurie's actions. Even when Laurie's father tries to correct his disrespectful behavior, with a stern "See here, young man," the parents think that it is Charles's influence that has made him act this way. 


At home, Laurie has the audacity to insult his father twice, saying "Hi Pop, y'old dust mop," and the joke: "Look up, look down, look at my thumb, gee you're dumb!" He laughs "insanely" after saying this to his father. He also shouts raucously in the house and down the street on his way home. He spilled his sister's milk and walks away while his father is still talking to him. 


All of these behaviors would be considered audacious today for a kindergartener, but in 1948 when it was first published, it would have seemed incredibly audacious. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more