Skip to main content

Present two characteristics of Stoicism as a moral doctrine. Do you think Stoicism is still relevant for us today?

Believers in Stoicism, a philosophy that developed in ancient Athens, believed that by living a virtuous life, people could achieve happiness. Adherents of this doctrine believed that virtue is sufficient and necessary to achieve happiness and that other worldly pursuits, including the pursuit of fame, achievement, or wealth, can not bring about the happiness that is conferred on us by practicing reason and virtue. Stoics also believed that we should live in harmony with nature and accept the idea that what we experience is the product of a larger cosmos over which we have no control. Our attempts to control what we can't actually control will only result in anger and disappointment.


Stoicism is a relevant doctrine for today's world in many ways. While pursuing fame or fortune can bring some good, this pursuit in and of itself, even if successful, clearly does not confer happiness on people. The news is filled with wealthy and successful people who are deeply troubled. Instead, leading a virtuous life can make us satisfied with our own actions and help us understand what we can control. We often cannot control whether we achieve fame or fortune, and we clearly cannot control the wider reality in which we live. Stoics believed in practicing self-control to protect oneself from destructive emotions. If we accept what we can control (our own mental state and judgments) while accepting what we cannot control (external realities), we may be happier about our lives. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more