Skip to main content

What are the differences between atoms, elements, and compounds?

A substance can be classified as either an element, a compound or as a mixture. An element is the purest form of matter and is composed of identical atoms (assuming no isotopes are there). Atoms are the smallest unit of matter that still retain their properties. A compound is made up of 2 or more elements in a certain fixed ratio. Thus, atoms form elements, and elements form compounds.


An atom retains the properties of a substance. An element retains the properties of its constituents, that is, atoms. A compound however, has properties that differ from its constituents. For example, water (chemical formula: H2O) is a compound and is made up of two elements- hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) in a fixed 2:1 ratio. Note that hydrogen contains atoms of hydrogen and oxygen contains atoms of oxygen. Now, hydrogen is combustible and oxygen aids combustion, however, their combination- water, is used for fire extinguishing.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.