Skip to main content

What do you think are the top two advantages and the top two disadvantages of federalism?

Advantage 1: Federalism allows countries to stay together if they have regions that are very different from one another.  If a country has very different regions and does not have federalism, all of the regions have to obey the same laws and many regions will be unhappy.  With federalism, the people of different regions can have much more autonomy and will be more likely to coexist peacefully.


Advantage 2: Federalism allows states or provinces to be “laboratories of democracy.”  What this means is that the various states can experiment with different approaches to problems.  Let us say that various states of the US want to try to improve education in different ways.  It would be possible to take many different approaches and see which ones work and which do not.  If there is no federalism, the whole country will have to try the same approach to education and we can only test out one approach at a time.


Disadvantage 1: With federalism, not all people have the same rights.  In the United States, women have more of a right to an abortion in some states than in others.  We can argue that this is wrong.  Either abortion is a right that all American women should have or it is an evil thing that should not be legal anywhere.  With federalism, we let some states have laws that, at least arguably, infringe on the rights of their citizens.  This leaves us with a situation where not all of the people in the same country have the same rights.


Disadvantage 2: With different states having so much power, businesses can play states off against one another.  They can tell State A that they will go to State B unless State A gives them subsidies.  This forces states to engage in bidding wars, giving away taxpayer money to try to lure businesses.  This is, arguably, wasteful and wrong.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more