Skip to main content

What do we know about climate change now, and what can we expect for the future?

Climate change is a direct result of the "greenhouse effect," or the global warming that has occurred due to the trapping of heat within Earth's atmosphere. Gases such as nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor (as well as chlorofluorocarbons) are all contributors to the greenhouse effect; many have concentratedly risen in recent years due to fossil fuel burning, industrial production, the clearing of land, and other human behaviors.


This warming has already had drastic effects on our planet. Melting glaciers and polar ice sheets have caused rapid rises in sea levels (and sea temperatures) and the diminishing of certain animal populations (such as polar bears, which are now considered endangered species); these changes mean that the ocean is almost 40% more acidic than before. Extreme weather events--such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires--are growing increasingly more likely and intense, posing major threats to human habitations and life. Food security is a greater problem than ever before, with farmers across the globe and their crops suffering the impact of unstable water supplies and poor weather patterns. Natural habitats, such as the rain forest and coral reefs, and the organisms that dwell there face eradication. The list of damages to our ecosystems, health, economy, and world at large goes on and on...


Predictions for the continued evolution of climate change indicate that all these phenomena are only going to worsen if we do not regulate the systematic destruction of the earth. NASA (as cited by the National Wildlife Foundation) has predicted that 25 to 25 percent of plant and animal species will be at risk of extinction if the current page of global warming continues. Scientific American published an interesting piece outlining some of the future risks, which I have provided a link to below. These include a "projected sea level rise of 3 to 6 feet," with some coastal cities disappearing altogether, including New Orleans and Atlantic City; a possible increase of 14 to 15 degrees (Fahrenheit) by the end of the century; and huge losses of water supplies.


The UCAR Center for Science Education also outlines several tipping points that would mark the planet passing the point of no return: the collapse of major ice sheets, the shutdown of the ocean's circulation mechanisms and/or the over saturation of ocean water with carbon, and the sudden release of methane. Although these events may not occur "soon" per se (bearing in mind that "soon" is relative on the scale of the universe's timeline), they are all major indicators of extinction... and will eventually arise if humans do not find a way to significantly shift their wasteful, unsustainable behaviors and patterns. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...