Skip to main content

During the progressive education reform movement what were the theories that came out of the progressive era? What do they look like in practice,...

In the early twentieth century, progressive education reform entailed the reconstruction of teaching methods, curricula and academic standards to reflect stronger democratic ideals; the ultimate goal was to turn American citizens into more engaged participants in democracy by creating greater access to education that promoted intellectual, creative, and psychological growth.


The roots of progressive reform theory lie in the works of European thinkers such as Rousseau and Locke, but were expanded on by later proponents in both America and Europe, including John Dewey, Helen Pankhurst, Rudolf Steiner, and Maria Montessori. By far the most influential of these was Dewey, who prioritized the needs and individuality of the student over the sanctity of a school as a domineering institutional voice. Dewey considered it the responsibility of the education system to consider a student's psychological as well as intellectual development by nurturing children's instincts, curiosity, and inquiry. In practice, the Dewey system entailed classroom discussion and student engagement rather than reliance on rote memorization, straightforward textbook learning, or lectures. Implementing Dewey's educational theories also resulted in a proliferation of studies in creative arts and manual skills that would encourage a more balanced and autonomous individual. 


Dewey's ideas resemble those of Rudolf Steiner, the inspiration for Waldorf education. Steiner viewed childhood development and learning as comprising three stages: practical activity and creative experiences in early childhood; artistic identity and social awareness in elementary school; and critical reasoning and empathy in secondary school. Thus, Steiner wanted education to cultivate children's intellectual, artistic, and practical skills. In practice, Waldorf schools function very differently than conventional ones. For example, Waldorf education encourages a non-competitive environment, there are no textbooks from kindergarten through fifth grade, arts classes are considered essential and not a 'frill' or 'privilege,' and teachers often stay with a certain class for several consecutive years. The ultimate goal is to create ethically mature, socially adjusted citizens.


One of the primary obstacles to progressive educational reform lies in its accessibility; many progressive schools are elite, private institutions that are inherently segregated along racial and economic lines because only certain families can afford the tuition. This is antithetical to progressive education values of democracy, equality, and tolerance. Furthermore, standardized testing, which is aimed at 'objectively' assessing intellectual skill regardless of academic background, creates pressure across institutions that creates undemocratic disadvantages; economically privileged students are able to tutor and prepare for such tests, skewing access to college and scholarship opportunities that use the test results as benchmarks of aptitude.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.