Skip to main content

Describe how World War I changed Europe.

World War I changed Europe in several ways. One change was that it brought an end to several empires. After World War I ended, the Empire of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire disappeared. Much of the Empire of Austria-Hungary was divided into several new nations based on the concept of self-determination.


Another change that occurred was that in some countries people wanted less to do with world affairs. In Great Britain and France, many people wanted to avoid another costly war. World War I devastated so much land and killed so many people that some countries in Europe tried to prevent another war from occurring. In part because of the Great Depression and in part because of the damage, death, and destruction caused by World War I, some European leaders ignored aggressive actions by Germany, Japan, and Italy in the 1930s. The leaders of Great Britain and France hoped appeasing Adolf Hitler would prevent another war from occurring. However, that didn’t work. Many European people agreed with the decision to try to avert another war.


In some European countries, mainly Germany and Italy, the people wanted revenge for the Versailles Treaty. Germany felt it was treated unfairly by the terms of this treaty. They were angry at the payment of reparations and having to accept the responsibility for World War I. Italy felt it didn’t gain enough land from the Versailles Treaty. In both countries, the leaders vowed to restore pride in their country.


World War I affected the European countries in different ways. While some countries wanted to avoid war, other countries were looking for revenge after World War I ended. Europe certainly was impacted as a result of World War I.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more