Skip to main content

In "The Canterville Ghost," what is the encounter between the two "ghosts" like?

 The encounter between the two ghosts takes place in Chapter Three of "The Canterville Ghost." In this scene, it is late at night and all members of the Otis family are asleep in bed. The ghost is planning to frighten Washington Otis but, as he makes his way towards the boy's room, he is confronted by a terrible sight:



Right in front of him was standing a horrible spectre, motionless as a carven image, and monstrous as a madman's dream!



After using heavy description to portray this other ghost, Wilde quickly switches his tactic by employing humour to describe the Canterville ghost's reaction:



Never having seen a ghost before, he naturally was terribly frightened, and, after a second hasty glance at the awful phantom, he fled back to his room.



This use of humour is effective in lightening the mood of the story. That the Canterville ghost has never seen a ghost before is also an example of irony, used here for comic effect. Wilde further adds to the humour when the Canterville ghost returns to confront this other ghost. Realising that this ghost is nothing more than a dummy, the Canterville ghost vows to take his revenge. He is foiled again, however, when the cockerel does not crow for a second time, making his oath completely worthless.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more