Skip to main content

What are the basic branches of Christianity and how do they differ from one another?

The three main branches of modern Christianity are Catholic, Protestant, and Eastern Orthodox.

The Catholic Church is the oldest; Catholicism dates its founding to the original church founded by Jesus, but reliable historical records only go back as far as the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. Catholicism is at least as old as that, and probably older. Catholicism is the world's largest religious sect, and is particularly prevalent in Latin America. The Catholic Church is headed by a single Pope, who lives in the autonomous region of Vatican City, legally defined as its own country separate from Italy, which completely surrounds it.

The Eastern Orthodox Church emerged in the 4th century and is centered in Eastern Europe, especially Greece and Russia. The Orthodox Church does not have one single leader, but it does have a number of high-level authorities known as Holy Synods. Theologically there are not many differences between the Catholic and Orthodox Church; it's more of a difference in their traditions and rituals.

The Protestant branch is by far the most varied. The first Protestant sect was founded by Martin Luther in 1521 and is still today called Lutheranism. Part of its emergence was due to the rise of the printing press and increased literacy; people could now read the Bible directly and did not have to rely on what priests handed down. Other sects soon emerged in a period known as the Protestant Reformation. Since then, many other Protestant sects have been founded. The Anglican Church is an interesting exception; it was founded before the Reformation, but today is generally considered a Protestant sect all the same. Protestants vary tremendously in their beliefs and practices; their defining attribute is that they assign ultimate authority to no individual person, but rather to the Bible itself.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more