Skip to main content

How is Charlotte Bronte's narrative in Jane Eyre analyzed according to Jungian and Marxist approaches (without using quotations)?

Marxist criticism examines literary works as "'products' of the economic and ideological determinants specific to that era" (Abrams 149).


In other words, literature reflects class struggle along with materialism and oppression. Marxists view literature as reflective of the social class of the author or as an analysis of class relations.


Class relations and conflict


Certainly, Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre contains elements of class struggle, since early in the narrative after Jane is orphaned and left penniless, she is forced to live with her uncle's family. There, she is abused and berated by her cousins, and told by her male cousin that she has no right to read their books, and he adds that she should not even be living with "gentlemen's children like them."


When her uncle dies, Jane is sent to Lowood, a school for orphans, where she suffers humiliation and deprivation. After her friend Helen dies, Jane must remain at the school, but she is nurtured by Miss Temple. When Miss Temple leaves the school after marrying, Jane, who has become a teacher, departs from Lowood and finds a job as a tutor for the protege of Mr. Rochester, a gentleman. As his employee, Jane is in no position to declare her growing feelings for this gentleman, despite his taking an interest in her. When, for instance, Mr. Rochester has a social gathering of young ladies and their mothers, Jane is clearly on the outside of this social circle. 


Oppression


Clearly, Jane Eyre overcomes oppression and social conflicts. She becomes an independent woman in a society in which few are; she finds a position as a tutor, but when Mr. Rochester wants her to violate the moral law and marry him although he already has a wife (albeit an insane one), she refuses. The cost to her is almost her life, but she is saved by those who turn out to be her relatives. When her cousin St. John wants her to become a missionary and marry him, Jane refuses because she does not love him, and she wishes to maintain her self-esteem and independence.


The Jungian approach to literature examines archetypes. In Bronte's novel, Jane Eyre is a Cinderella type, as she overcomes the abuse of siblings and arises as the heroine of the narrative and lives happily ever after.


Jane returns to Thornfield after a supernatural experience of hearing Mr. Rochester. There she finds her true love, who has been injured in a fire, but she is able to help him and his love for her has remained, so they live "happily everafter."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.