Skip to main content

How would you characterize European interactions with the non-western world (seen through the crusaders, other non-western Empires, and the African...

Historically, European interaction with the non-western world has often been colored by ethnocentrism, exploitation, and violence. During the Crusades, the Latin Church sanctioned a series of religious wars from the 11th to the 16th centuries, seeking to recapture Christian territory, defend Christians in non-Christian lands, gain political and territorial advantage, and combat paganism. The capture of Jerusalem from Islamic rule can be seen as the first experiment in European colonialism. Other lands and properties were also seized from pagans on religious grounds. These events resulted in lasting mistrust between the Latin Church and the Islamic and Orthodox religions. However, another consequence of the Crusades was increased trade and contact between Western Europe and the Islamic world, leading, some argue, to improved perceptions of Islamic culture among Europeans.


Western Europe’s interactions with non-western Empires during the early modern period (late 15th century to the late 18th century) reveal their weaker position compared to the Turkish Ottoman Empire (which stretched from Europe into the Middle East and North Africa) and even the Persian Safavid Empire and the Indian Mughal Empire. These non-western powers held geopolitical advantage as powerful, wealthy, and militarily advanced civilizations. In this era, Western Europeans would often travel to these regions for trade. The Ottoman Empire especially was often perceived by the West as an object of both fear and fascination, due to their power, advanced accomplishments, and intellectual pursuits.  


When Western European colonizers began to migrate to and settle in other lands, there emerged an unequal relationship with the kingdoms of Africa. Many African communities were forced into colonial trade with more economically developed European countries, exchanging raw materials and slaves for manufactured goods. Few Europeans settled in Africa, however, largely due to fear of disease and strong native resistance. The effects of the transatlantic slave trade continue to be felt. Approximately one to two million died in transit to the New World, with about 12 million slaves entering the slave trade in the Americas.


In general, these moments in history reveal a Western Europe that has maintained its distinct cultural identity, often defined in contrast to the cultures of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.