Skip to main content

How would I create a dialogue between Laurie’s parents when his mother comes home from the PTA meeting in "Charles" by Shirley Jackson?

Laurie’s parents would probably talk about how much trouble Laurie has been in at school, and why he created Charles to tell them about his antics. 


A dialogue is a conversation between two people.  In this case, Laurie’s parents have thought he was a normal boy, despite the trouble he got into at home.  Both are busy with the new baby and their lives, and they did not really notice.


Laurie has told his parents that there was a little boy at school who was causing a lot of trouble. 



“What did he do?” I asked. “Who was it?”


Laurie thought. “It was Charles,” he said. “He was fresh. The teacher spanked him and made him stand in a corner. He was awfully fresh.” 



I imagine the dialogue would go something like this.


“You will never believe what I found out at the PTA Meeting!” Laurie’s mom exclaimed as soon as she came in the door.


“What? Did you meet Charles’s mother?” Her husband asked absentmindedly.


“You could say that.”  She paused.  “I am Charles’s mother.”


This got his attention.  “What?”


“There is no Charles.  Laurie made him up.  Everything he told us happened.  It was Laurie.”


“Wow.  I wonder why he would make up a story like that?” Laurie’s father looked puzzled and amused.


“I guess he had a little more trouble settling into kindergarten than we thought.”


You can imagine how the conversation would go.  Basically, his parents were clueless, but there were plenty of signs.  Laurie was trouble at class, and was happy to come home every day and report on Charles’s behavior.


Make sure you include a lot of details in your dialogue.  I have included a link on proper computation of dialogue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...