Skip to main content

How and why did agriculture develop differently in the middle colonies and in the southern colonies?

In both the middle colonies and the southern colonies, farming was an important economic activity. However, there were some differences between these regions.


In the southern colonies, farming was the main economic activity. There was very little industry in the southern colonies. The soil was fertile, and the climate was suited for farming. In the southern colonies, farmers grew tobacco, indigo, and rice. Many slaves were used on the large farms in the South.


In the middle colonies, there were a variety of economic activities. There was more manufacturing in the middle colonies than in the southern colonies. Farming was important, but it wasn’t the only economic activity. Farmers in the middle colonies were known for the grains they grew. Wheat was one crop that was grown and sold. The middle colonies are often called “the breadbasket colonies” because of the grain that was grown in this region. Slavery did exist in the middle colonies. However, since the farms in the middle colonies weren’t as large as the plantations in the South, there weren’t as many slaves in the middle colonies.


While farming occurred in both regions, there were some differences between the regions related to farming.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.