Skip to main content

In The Merchant of Venice, how does Portia encourage the prince of Morocco when he displays his vanity?

The verbal exchange between the prince of Morocco and Portia occurs at the beginning of Act ll, Scene 1. The prince has obviously arrived to chance his luck to win Portia's hand by participating in the lottery her deceased father concocted. The prince blathers on about his greatness and asks Portia not to discriminate against him because of his darker complexion. He comes across as quite boastful and conceited.


Portia's retort encourages him. She informs the prince that her choice for a husband is not limited only to what she might see as attractive but that the lottery bars her from making any choice whatsoever. In this sense, then, the prince has as much a chance as any of her suitors.


In response, the prince thanks Portia for her kind remark and begins bragging again about his prowess as a soldier and the quality of his courage—all skills he would use to win Portia's heart. He alludes to characters in Greek mythology when making the point that just as Hercules might lose a sought-after prize to a weaker man in a lottery because of destiny, he too could lose out on winning Portia's hand. The prince evidently deems himself the equal of Hercules and Alcides, both heroic characters in Greek literature. He states that he would die of grief if he should, similarly, lose Portia to a lesser man.


Portia informs him that he should take his chance or decide not to choose. If he does choose and loses, he is forbidden from ever approaching another woman in way of marriage, since this is one of the requirements of the lottery. The prince accepts and is eager to try his luck. Portia stays him and advises that they must first proceed to the temple where he would have to make a solemn oath to abide to the conditions of the lottery. He can then try his luck after they have had dinner.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more