Skip to main content

How can you explain the following lines from Rudyard Kipling's poem "If"?"If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with...

Rudyard Kipling is teaching his son how to be a virtuous man and a leader in his poem “If.”


In the 25th and 26th lines of the poem he writes,



If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,  


    Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch,



He is explaining to his son that having the ability to interact and spend time with people from all walks of life will serve him well. A man, who is able to maintain his morals and standards even while interacting with those of different classes will prosper. Whether interacting with the general population, or those considered to be of a higher class distinction, it is important to be true to yourself. He is advising his son not to degrade himself, nor to put on airs.


These lines become universal when they are applied to all men. When a person can relate to all mankind, he will be on the path to a life well lived, in harmony with others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more