Skip to main content

How did WWI change the method by which wars are fought?

WWI, at least on the Western Front in France and Belgium, became a war of attrition to be fought in trenches.  Machine guns and barbed wire made frontal assaults suicidal and casualty figures for battles such as the Somme and Verdun were staggering.  Generals at the time still believed that battles would be won with cavalry charges and quick infantry maneuvers, but their ideas were proven horribly wrong by the end of 1914.  In order to break the stalemate on the Western Front, both sides looked to chemistry and engineering with the use of poison gas and tanks, respectively.  These proved to be indiscriminate killers of men and soldiers quickly lost any romantic notion of war they may have had.  


The airplane was also used in this war.  For the first time, cities were bombed from the air, though not to the extent they would be in the next world war.  Pilots were "guinea pigs" in new combat techniques and plane design, and more pilots died in accidents than in air combat.  


Finally, naval warfare was different as well.  Both Allied and Central Powers built up impressive armadas of giant battleships, thinking that there would be a massive battle for control of the seas.  Other than Jutland, which was inconclusive anyway, this never happened.  German submarines came closer to ending the war than any battleship fleet.  German submarines also played a key role in bringing America into the war.  


The most tragic change of this war would be the manner in which civilians and their goods were targeted.  Germany developed the Paris gun which could lob a shell over ten miles into the city.  While warfare against civilians happened before this war, technology now sanitized the process of killing a noncombatant.  Blimps dropped bombs on civilians.  They were considered vital to the war effort as they could be drafted or work in war industries, so civilians were considered fair game.  Both the Allied blockade of the North Sea and the German U-boat blockade affected food coming into Europe, but the Allied blockade of Germany proved to be more effective, and the winter of 1917-1918 was known as the "Turnip Winter" as Germans were reduced to eating a root otherwise reserved for their livestock.  The German army was not defeated in the field, but the German government was overthrown by a starving populace.  The Allies kept up the blockade throughout peace negotiations, and the Treaty of Versailles was signed under this duress, which made a war of retaliation likely.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more