Skip to main content

In "Thank You, M'am" how is the $10 Mrs. Jones gives Roger actually quite a sacrifice?

The main character in Langston Hughes' short story “Thank You, M'am” doesn't have much, other than a big body and an even bigger name: Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones. That's why the end of the story is such an ironic surprise to the reader.


When Roger, the young thief, turns to leave, Mrs. Jones gives him $10 and tells him to buy himself some blue suede shoes, which was what he tried to steal the money for in the first place. Ten dollars doesn't sound like much, especially today. But to give it some perspective, let's look at what prices were like when this story was published, in 1958. In 1958 the average price of a loaf of bread was 19 cents, a gallon of gas was 25 cents, and a postage stamp was 4 cents. Minimum wage at that time was $1.00 an hour.


So let's look at it this way, in giving Roger $10, Mrs. Jones has given him the equivalent of 50 loaves of bread, or 40 gallons of gas, or 250 postage stamps. We don't know how much money Mrs. Jones made in the hotel beauty shop, but she probably worked for something around minimum wage, which means she may have given Roger more than a full day's wages after he attempted to steal from her in the street.


We should also look at how Hughes describes the setting of where she lives. He establishes her precarious financial situation when he tells the reader that she was a “roomer,” which means she rented a room, not an entire apartment. She has a hot plate and an ice box, instead of more expensive appliances like a stove or refrigerator. She also has a day-bed, which is a bed that can convert to a couch, because she doesn't have enough space for both.


Ten dollars was no small sum for someone in Mrs. Jones situation. Her gift to Roger was generous, both financially and morally.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more