Skip to main content

If you were a pilot flying from Tokyo, Japan, to Vancouver, B.C., what would you do to minimize the time required to complete the flight?

The Earth is approximately a sphere, and the way to minimize distance (and thus, travel time, all other things equal) is to travel along a great circle, a circle that covers the full circumference of the sphere. Any other path along the surface of the sphere that travels between those two points will necessarily be longer.

Where this becomes counter-intuitive is that you will, in general, not stay at the same latitude, nor simply interpolate between the two latitudes. (If you are traveling between two points on the equator, such as from Quito, Ecuador to Kampala, Uganda, you do stay along the equator; but that's the only time you would.) The great circle that contains Tokyo and Vancouver actually passes through the southern peninsula of Alaska, despite the fact that Alaska is at a higher latitude than either Tokyo or Vancouver. This also has the advantage that if necessary the flight could ditch in Alaska, whereas flying over the Pacific Ocean would leave them with few options.

To help intuit this a little better, it can help to actually look at a globe, rather than a map (since maps inherently distort the shape of the Earth); also, if you think about traveling between two points that are far north on opposite sides of the globe, you wouldn't try to stay at the same latitude, you'd go over the North Pole. The trip from Tokyo to Vancouver doesn't require traversing the North Pole, but it's the same principle; the shortest route curves up to a higher latitude and then back down.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.