Skip to main content

How were war preparations in Germany different from war preparations in the United States?

I think the two most important differences between US war preparations and German war preparations in WW2 were (1) The US prepared for war fairly openly, while Germany conducted most of the preparation in secret, and (2) The US was prepared to exert economic superiority over a prolonged war of attrition, while Germany was unprepared for a long conflict and hoping for a swift victory.

Germany was ostensibly not allowed to militarize under the Treaty of Versailles (signed at the end of WW1), so they had to conduct most of their military preparations in secret, disguising them as much as possible. It wasn't until the late 1930s that they really openly began to militarize, and within a few years they had already started the war by invading Poland. Hitler had a plan to win the war in four years, and only established sufficient preparation to support Germany's military for that length of time. Their plans didn't even make it four years, and Germany was already strained in supplies and struggling to maintain its advance against the USSR by 1942.

The US, on the other hand, stayed out of the war until the end of 1941, when Japan launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. The US declared war on Japan in response, and Germany declared war on them in response to that. Before that, the US had been covertly supporting the UK (and to a lesser extent, the USSR) in the war effort, as well as quite overtly expanding their own military capability, particular in terms of naval forces. The US also instituted a draft even before officially entering the war.

Though formally neutral, US leaders recognized that they'd be brought into the war sooner or later, and wanted to make sure they were ready. And ready they were: By the time the US actually entered the war, they were already militarily and economically superior to every other country in the world; victory was largely a matter of time as the overwhelming US might was brought to bear against dwindling German and Japanese forces.

Still, in part because the US waited so long to enter the war, losses were heavy among other Allied nations, especially the USSR. The USSR lost over 20 times as many people as the US, and twice as many as Germany. The UK lost almost as many as the US, despite having a much smaller population to begin with.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more