Skip to main content

What are two passages in Great Expectations that illustrate the lack of warmth and personality of Mr. Jaggers?

Two instances that illustrate the lack of warmth and personableness of Mr. Jagger occur in the First Stage of Great Expectations when Pip first encounters him, and with Pip's meeting with him in Mr. Jaggers's office in the Second Stage.


1. In Chapter XI, as Pip returns to Satis House after six days according to Miss Havisham's instructions, he again follows Estella, who holds a candle, up the dark stairs. This time, he encounters a gentleman, who is groping his way down in the darkness. This is Mr. Jaggers:



He took my chin in his large hand and turned up my face to have a look at me in the light of the candle.
"Boy of the neighborhood? Hey?" said he.
"Yes, sir..."
"How do you come here?"



When Pip explains that he has been sent for, Mr. Jaggers responds in a very negative manner, prejudging Pip as a miscreant.



"Well! Behave yourself. I have a pretty large experience of boys, and you're a bad set of fellows. Now mind!. . . You behave yourself!" 



2. In Chapter XX, after Pip arrives in London, he goes to Jaggers's office in Little Britain. There he meets Mr. Wemmick, who informs Pip that Mr. Jaggers has left word for Pip to wait "in his room." Pip is escorted to an inner chamber, where he is struck by its dismal quality. When Mr. Jaggers arrives, he eats his lunch without offering Pip anything, and he informs Pip coldly of his allowance—"a very liberal one"—while handing Pip the cards of various tradesmen with whom he should deal for clothes and other items that he might need. Mr. Jaggers then adds with no warmth,



You will find your credit good, Mr. Pip. . . but I shall by this means be able to check your bills, and to pull you up if I find you outrunning the constable. Of course, you'll go wrong somehow, but that no fault of mine.



Pip narrates with irony, "I pondered a little over this encouraging sentiment."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more