Skip to main content

By what method is Rosie characterized in "Raymond's Run"?

Most of the characterization of Rosie is direct, meaning that Squeaky, the narrator, describes her specifically.  There is also some indirect characterization because Rosie is described through her actions and words.


An example of the direct characterization is Squeaky’s introduction of Rosie.  She is upset because Rosie makes fun of her brother Raymond, who has special needs. 



Rosie … is as fat as I am skinny and has a big mouth where Raymond is concerned and is too stupid to know that there is not a big deal of difference between herself and Raymond and that she can’t afford to throw stones.



Rosie has also been hanging out with the new girl Gretchen.  Rosie, Mary Louise, and Gretchen seem to go around together a lot.  Squeaky is not included.  She feels left out, because Mary Louise used to be her friend before Gretchen came. She never liked Rosie, because of her attitude apparently.


Squeaky describes Rosie as “salty.”  By this she means that Rosie is sassy or rude.



“I don’t think you’re going to win this time,” says Rosie, trying to signify with her hands on her hips all salty, completely forgetting that I have whupped her behind many times for less salt than that.



When Squeaky tells them not to say anything about Raymond, Rosie sasses her with “What are you, his mother?” and Squeaky responds that she will be the mother of anyone who messes with him.  Squeaky calls Rosie stupid and fat because she doesn’t like the way she acts toward Raymond.  She feels that Rosie is mean, and they fight.


Squeaky is not afraid to stand up for herself, and not afraid to fight for Raymond.  She feels that since he is different, she has to protect him.  Mary Louise asks an innocent question about him, but Rosie turns the conversation mean and that’s when Squeaky gets threatening.  That is an example of indirect characterization of Rosie.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more